The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton by Douglas Ambrose Robert W. T. Martin

Author:Douglas Ambrose, Robert W. T. Martin [Douglas Ambrose, Robert W. T. Martin]
Language: eng
Format: epub
ISBN: 9780814707241
Barnesnoble:
Publisher: New York University Press
Published: 2007-09-01T00:00:00+00:00

NOTES

1. George W. Carey, The Federalist: Design for a Constitutional Republic (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989); Robert Dahl, Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956); Gottfried Dietze, The Federalist: A Classic of Federalism and Free Government (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1960); David F. Epstein, The Political Theory of The Federalist (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984); Albert Furtwangler, The Authority of Publius: A Reading of The Federalist Papers (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984); Charles Kesler, ed., Saving the Revolution: The Federalist Papers and the American Founding (New York: Free Press, 1987); Garry Wills, Explaining America: The Federalist (New York: Penguin Books, 1981); and Morton White, Philosophy, The Federalist, and the Constitution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).

2. On the frequently contradictory nature, if “not outright inconsistency” of The Federalist, see Jack Rakove, “Early Uses of The Federalist,’” in Saving The Revolution, ed. Kesler, 238.

3. Gordon Wood, “The Democratization of Mind in the American Revolution,” in The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, ed. Robert H. Horowitz, 3rd ed. (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1986), 123, 117.

4. See Daniel Walker Howe, “Language of Faculty Psychology in The Federalist Papers,” in Conceptual Change and the Constitution, ed. Terence Ball and J. G. A. Pocock (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1988), 118.

5. See Howe, “Language of Faculty Psychology,” 127, and Bernard Bailyn, To Begin the World Anew (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003), 108–9.

6. See Martin Diamond, “Democracy and The Federalist A Reconsideration of the Framers’ Intent,” American Political Science Review 53 (Mar. 1959): 64, and George F. Will, Statecraft as Soulcraft: What Government Does (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983), 43, who writes that with Publius “the task of restraining and transforming the appetites is replaced by the task of directing them into useful, or at least not harmful, channels.”

7. Hamilton, “Speech [22 June 1787],” in Max Farrand, ed., The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, 4 vols., rev. ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1937), 1: 376.

8. See Terence Ball, “A Republic—If You Can Keep It,” in Conceptual Change and the Constitution, ed. Terence Ball and J. G. A. Pocock (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1988), 151–52; John T. Agresto, “Liberty, Virtue, and Republicanism: 1776–1787,” Review of Politics 39 (Oct. 1977): 473–504; David E. Narrett, “A Zeal for Liberty: The Anti-Federalist Case against the Constitution in New York,” in Essays on Liberty and Federalism: The Shaping of the U.S. Constitution, ed. David E. Narrett and Joyce S. Goldberg (College Station: University of Texas Press, 1988), 73; and Saul Cornell, The Other Founders: Anti-Federalism and the Dissenting Tradition in America, 1788–1828 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999).

9. I treat Hamilton and Madison as a collective author, Publius. In support, see George W. Carey, “Publius—A Split Personality?” Review of Politics 46 (Jan. 1984): 18–19; Martin Diamond, “The Federalist’s View of Federalism,” in Essays in Federalism, ed. George C. S. Benson (Claremont, CA: Institute for the Study of Federalism, 1961), 34; and Thomas S. Engeman, Edward J.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.